徹底激怒特朗普!前防長聲明:他想分裂美國(全文)
來源 繼民財經匯
美國前國防部長發布公開信,反對特朗普就美國當下暴亂的強硬立場,這封公開信徹底激怒了特朗普, 以下是特朗普對該信的推文反擊:


看來這封公開信攻擊到了特朗普的痛點,這是啥樣的公開信呢?全文如下(中文翻譯僅供參考,后附英文原文為準)
我已經看到了本周正在發生的事件,憤怒和震驚。美國最高法院的三角墻上刻著“法律面前人人平等“的字樣。這正是抗議者所要求的。這是一種健全和統一的要求——我們所有人都應該能夠支持這一要求。我們不能被少數犯法者分散注意力。成千上萬有良知的人堅持要求我們遵守我們的價值觀——我們作為人民的價值觀和我們作為一個國家的價值觀。這些抗議是由成千上萬有良知的人所定義的。
大約50年前,當我參軍時,我曾宣誓支持和捍衛憲法。我從未想過,在任何情況下都會下令軍隊做出同樣的宣誓,以侵犯本國公民的憲法權利——更不用說為當選的總司令提供一個奇異的拍照機會了,而軍事領導人站在旁邊。
我們必須拒絕任何把我們的城市看作是“戰場”的想法,拒絕將我們的武裝部隊用于“控制局面”。在國內,只有在各州州長要求的情況下,我們才應該使用我們的軍隊,這在非常罕見的情況下。正如我們在華盛頓目睹的那樣,使我們的反應軍事化,在軍隊和平民社會之間制造了一場沖突——一場虛假的沖突。它侵蝕了道德基礎,這種基礎確保了穿制服的男女之間以及他們發誓要保護的社會之間的可靠聯系,而他們自己也是其中的一部分。維持公共秩序取決于各州和地方民權領導人,他們最了解他們的社區,并對他們負責。
詹姆斯·麥迪遜在《聯邦主義者》14中寫道“美國聯合了一些軍隊,或者沒有一個士兵,表現出比分裂的美國更可怕的對外野心,十萬老兵準備戰斗。”我們不需要將我們對抗議的反應軍事化。我們需要團結在一個共同的目標周圍。它首先保證我們在法律面前人人平等。
在諾曼底登陸前,軍事部門給我們的部隊的指示提醒士兵們:“納粹毀滅我們的口號是“分而治之”。我們美國人的回答是:“在聯盟中有力量(團結才是力量?!薄蔽覀儽仨殘F結起來克服這場危機——相信我們比我們的政治更好。
唐納德·特朗普是我一生中第一個不試圖團結美國人民的總統——甚至不假裝嘗試。相反,他試圖分裂我們。我們正在目睹這種深思熟慮的努力三年所產生的后果。我們正在目睹三年沒有成熟領導能力的后果。我們可以在沒有他的情況下團結起來,利用我們民間社會固有的力量。正如過去幾天所表明的那樣,這并非易事,但我們有責任為我們的同胞、為捍衛我們的諾言而流血的前幾代人以及為我們的兒童。
我們可以更堅強地度過這段艱難的時期,帶著全新的目標感和對彼此的尊重。這一流行病向我們表明,不僅我們的部隊愿意為社區的安全作出最大犧牲。在醫院、雜貨店、郵局和其他地方的美國人為了服務他們的同胞和國家,不惜犧牲生命。我們知道,我們比我們在拉法葉公園目睹的濫用行政權力更好。我們必須拒絕和追究那些在任者的責任,他們將是對我們憲法的嘲弄。與此同時,我們必須記住林肯的“更好的天使”,并傾聽他們的聲音,因為我們正在努力團結起來。
只有走一條新的道路——這實際上意味著回到我們建國理想的最初道路——我們才能再次成為一個在國內外受到欽佩和尊重的國家。
詹姆斯·馬蒂斯
I have watched this week’s unfolding events, angry and appalled。 The words “Equal Justice Under Law” are carved in the pediment of the United States Supreme Court。 This is precisely what protesters are rightly demanding。 It is a wholesome and unifying demand—one that all of us should be able to get behind。 We must not be distracted by a small number of lawbreakers。 The protests are defined by tens of thousands of people of conscience who are insisting that we live up to our values—our values as people and our values as a nation。
When I joined the military, some 50 years ago, I swore an oath to support and defend the Constitution。 Never did I dream that troops taking that same oath would be ordered under any circumstance to violate the Constitutional rights of their fellow citizens—much less to provide a bizarre photo op for the elected commander-in-chief, with military leadership standing alongside。
We must reject any thinking of our cities as a “battlespace” that our uniformed military is called upon to “dominate?!?At home, we should use our military only when requested to do so, on very rare occasions, by state governors。 Militarizing our response, as we witnessed in Washington, D.C。, sets up a conflict—a false conflict—between the military and civilian society。 It erodes the moral ground that ensures a trusted bond between men and women in uniform and the society they are sworn to protect, and of which they themselves are a part。 Keeping public order rests with civilian state and local leaders who best understand their communities and are answerable to them。
James Madison wrote in Federalist 14 that “America united with a handful of troops, or without a single soldier, exhibits a more forbidding posture to foreign ambition than America disunited, with a hundred thousand veterans ready for combat?!?We do not need to militarize our response to protests。 We need to unite around a common purpose。 And it starts by guaranteeing that all of us are equal before the law。
Instructions given by the military departments to our troops before the Normandy invasion reminded soldiers that “The Nazi slogan for destroying us…was ‘Divide and Conquer?!?Our American answer is ‘In Union there is Strength?!?We must summon that unity to surmount this crisis—confident that we are better than our politics。
Donald Trump is the first president in my lifetime who does not try to unite the American people—does not even pretend to try。 Instead, he tries to divide us。 We are witnessing the consequences of three years of this deliberate effort。 We are witnessing the consequences of three years without mature leadership。 We can unite without him, drawing on the strengths inherent in our civil society。 This will not be easy, as the past few days have shown, but we owe it to our fellow citizens; to past generations that bled to defend our promise; and to our children。
We can come through this trying time stronger, and with a renewed sense of purpose and respect for one another。 The pandemic has shown us that it is not only our troops who are willing to offer the ultimate sacrifice for the safety of the community。 Americans in hospitals, grocery stores, post offices, and elsewhere have put their lives on the line in order to serve their fellow citizens and their country。 We know that we are better than the abuse of executive authority that we witnessed in Lafayette Park。 We must reject and hold accountable those in office who would make a mockery of our Constitution。 At the same time, we must remember Lincoln’s “better angels,” and listen to them, as we work to unite。
Only by adopting a new path—which means, in truth, returning to the original path of our founding ideals—will we again be a country admired and respected at home and abroad。
James Mattis
最新消息, 特朗普的民調突然下來, 被拜登趕超‘
對特朗普而言,這才是真正的戰場。。。。。。


據CNN 報道,在警察殺害喬治·弗洛伊德和正在進行的抗擊冠狀病毒大流行的抗議活動中,一些非常重要的事情被忽視了:唐納德·特朗普總統現在是一個注定的失敗者,他要在秋季贏得第二個任期所需的270張選舉人票。
周三公布的一系列搖擺州(不那么搖擺的州)的民意調查清楚地表明了這一現實。
在亞利桑那州的??怂剐侣劽褚庹{查顯示,喬拜登領先特朗普46%比42%
在俄亥俄州的??怂剐侣劽褚庹{查中,拜登的得票率為45%,特朗普的得票率為43%。
*威斯康星州的??怂剐侣劽裾{顯示拜登和特朗普的支持率分別為49%和40%。
*昆尼皮亞克大學(Quinnipiac University)在德克薩斯州進行的民調顯示,特朗普的得票率為44%,拜登為43%。
這些數字對特朗普有多糟糕?說得好聽一點:真的很糟。
今年的美國大選,看來是沒有硝煙的激勵戰場。。。。。
| 留言與評論(共有 0 條評論) |


